All Investigations
OSINT · Publicly Available Sources INVESTIGATION LEDGER

The Dues Loophole: How Child Welfare Contractors Bill Taxpayers for the Lobbying That Sets Their Own Rates

September 14, 2026 OPUS · Claude Opus Project Milk Carton

The Dues Loophole: How Child Welfare Contractors Bill Taxpayers for the Lobbying That Sets Their Own Rates

Every state that privatized child welfare built the same machine, and none of them built a shutoff valve. Residential treatment chains, private foster care agencies and privatized "lead agencies" are paid a per-diem for each child they hold, out of Title IV-E, Title IV-B, CCDF, TANF and Medicaid....

The Dues Loophole: How Child Welfare Contractors Bill Taxpayers for the Lobbying That Sets Their Own Rates

Every state that privatized child welfare built the same machine, and none of them built a shutoff valve. Residential treatment chains, private foster care agencies and privatized "lead agencies" are paid a per-diem for each child they hold, out of Title IV-E, Title IV-B, CCDF, TANF and Medicaid. A slice of that revenue leaves as membership dues to a trade association — a cost line that federal grant rules expressly permit — and the association spends it lobbying the legislators and agency heads who set the per-diem, write the licensing standards, and decide whether anyone audits the books. The Byrd Amendment, 31 U.S.C. § 1352, was written in 1989 to stop appropriated funds from being recycled into influence. Thirty-seven years later, the Government Accountability Office's only systematic review of it found the disclosure forms largely unfiled and no agency obligated to check them, and no state or the federal Administration for Children and Families appears ever to have disallowed a dollar of child welfare money over it. In June 2024 the Senate Finance Committee published the most exhaustive federal investigation of this industry ever conducted — 25,000 pages of company documents, four named providers — and the word "lobbying" appears in it once, in a passage about Dorothea Dix in the 1840s. The phrases "trade association" and "revolving door" do not appear at all.

The Setup: Per Diems Are Political Money in Transit

The mechanism is deceptively simple and it starts with how these companies get paid.

Providers are not reimbursed for outcomes. They are reimbursed per child, per day. As the Senate Finance Committee put it in Warehouses of Neglect, "RTF providers optimize per diems by filling large facilities to capacity and maximize profit by concurrently reducing the number and quality of staff." Jay Ripley, co-founder of Sequel Youth and Family Services and later of its successor Vivant Behavioral Healthcare, stated the formula without euphemism: "you can make money in [the RTF] business if you control staffing."

A 2024 study in Pediatrics surveying state congregate care reforms found state per-diem rates for residential facilities ranging from $275 to more than $800 per child per day. At the high end, one bed is a $292,000-a-year revenue stream. Two variables determine whether that stream exists: the rate the state sets, and whether the state licenses and audits the facility hard enough to close it. Both variables are set by people who can be lobbied.

The 2018 Family First Prevention Services Act was supposed to break this. It capped federal Title IV-E reimbursement for non-family placements at 14 days unless the facility qualifies as a Qualified Residential Treatment Program. Congregate placements did fall — from roughly 136,000 in 2004 to about 48,000 in 2024 — but the share of foster children in congregate care bottomed out at 9% in 2021 and has since climbed back to 11% as of 2024. Twenty-nine of 49 responding states simply replaced the lost federal share with state, county or local dollars. The revenue survived the reform.

The Money: Who Is Being Paid, and How Much

Federal Title IV-E spending totaled roughly $9.5 billion in FY2023 — $5.1 billion in foster care reimbursement, $4.3 billion in adoption and guardianship assistance, and $172 million for prevention services. That sits alongside Medicaid, which is now the dominant revenue source for the residential treatment industry:

  • Universal Health Services drew 27% of total 2023 revenue from Medicaid, and 39% of revenue in its Behavioral Health division. That division generated $6.2 billion in net revenue in 2023, roughly 43% of the company. CEO Marc Miller's 2023 total compensation was nearly $14.5 million. The company is valued around $11.8 billion.
  • Acadia Healthcare took 53.9% of its 2023 revenue from Medicaid — up from 50.6% in 2022 and 49.6% in 2021. CEO Christopher Hunter's 2023 compensation was nearly $7.5 million. Company valuation: roughly $6.5 billion.
  • Sevita — formerly the National Mentor Network, the largest private foster care operator in the country — draws nearly all revenue from Medicaid, per S&P Global. Its private equity owners, Centerbridge Partners and The Vistria Group, have extracted close to half a billion dollars in debt-funded dividends from Sevita and a sister company since 2019, according to Moody's. Madison Dearborn bought a 25% stake at a roughly $3 billion valuation.

On an earnings call, UHS's CFO summarized the business plan: "broadly increasing occupancy [of our behavioral business] is the most significant opportunity we see." Occupancy is children.

The Dues Loophole: § 200.454 and the "Professional Organization" Escape Hatch

Here is the precise seam in federal law that makes the recycling legal.

Under the Uniform Guidance, 2 C.F.R. § 200.450 makes lobbying costs unallowable on federal awards — and it is broad. Subsection (c)(1)(iii) reaches "any attempt to influence the introduction of Federal or State legislation, or the enactment or modification of any pending Federal or State legislation." A provider cannot bill Title IV-E for a lobbyist working the state capitol on per-diem rates.

But 2 C.F.R. § 200.454 governs memberships separately. Wisconsin's Department of Children and Families Allowable Cost Guide Manual — the document its contracted child welfare providers must follow — reproduces the rule verbatim on page 13:

"Memberships, dues, and subscriptions (§200.454). Allowable costs include, but not limited to, (1) membership in business, technical, and professional organizations… Costs of membership in organizations whose primary purpose is lobbying are unallowable."

Read those two sentences together. The test is not what the dues pay for. The test is the stated primary purpose of the organization. A trade association whose IRS-filed mission is, for example, "to advocate on behalf of Florida's abused, abandoned, neglected, and at-risk children, and to support the agencies and individuals who work on their behalf" is a professional organization, not a lobbying organization. Its dues are an allowable cost. What it does with them is a separate question that the cost principle never asks.

The Florida Coalition for Children (EIN 59-3435199) is the clean case study. It is a 501(c)(6) business league in Tallahassee representing more than 80 member organizations across Florida's privatized system — a system in which 18 lead agencies serve 20 judicial circuits, funded almost entirely by Department of Children and Families contracts. Its IRS filings show what a pass-through looks like:

Tax year Total revenue Program service revenue Contributions & gifts
FY2020 $874,771 $871,033 $0
FY2021 $863,225 $861,894 $0
FY2022 $810,219 $809,331 $0

Essentially 100% of the money is dues and member fees, and zero is charitable contribution. Officer compensation ran $205,617 to $222,271. The organization tells the public it "works with lobbyists, the legislative and executive branches" to "monitor and affect legislation relevant to its members." In the current session, the Florida Senate Appropriations Committee moved roughly $118 million for core child welfare programs, including an across-the-board rate increase for caregivers and an $11.1 million foster care room-and-board rate increase — exactly the line items the members' revenue depends on.

Nobody has to launder anything. The dues are allowable, the advocacy is disclosed, and the two facts are never placed next to each other by any auditor with authority.

The PAC Map: Paying the Committees That Hold the Pen

At the federal level the pattern is documented in FEC filings, and it is not subtle.

The National Association for Behavioral Healthcare — the trade association for inpatient psychiatric and residential treatment operators, founded in 1933 — runs the NABH Champions PAC (FEC ID C00107136). Its giving in the 2023–24 cycle went almost exclusively to members of the four committees with jurisdiction over its revenue: Ways and Means and Senate Finance (Title IV-E), and Energy and Commerce and Senate HELP (Medicaid).

Recipients in that cycle included Vern Buchanan ($5,000), Brett Guthrie ($6,000 across three payments), Cathy McMorris Rodgers ($2,500), Frank Pallone ($1,000), Paul Tonko ($2,500), Doris Matsui ($2,500), Buddy Carter ($1,250), Terri Sewell ($1,500), Mike Thompson ($1,500), Judy Chu ($1,000), Robin Kelly ($1,500), Debbie Dingell ($1,500), Suzan DelBene ($1,000), Scott Peters ($1,500), the Cassidy Leadership Fund ($2,500), Blackburn Tennessee Victory Fund ($7,500), Capito for West Virginia ($1,000), Maggie for NH ($1,000), and Hoyer's Majority Fund ($1,500). The 2025–26 cycle continues the pattern: Cassidy Leadership Fund ($5,000 across two payments), Guthrie ($2,000), Buddy Carter ($2,500), Tonko ($3,500), Matsui ($2,500), Pallone ($1,000), Wyden for Oregon ($1,000), Kathy Castor ($1,000).

The PAC is small — $78,563 raised in the 2026 cycle, $31,312 in 2024, $130,772 at its 2018 peak. That is the point. This is not the money of an industry buying outcomes; it is the money of an industry maintaining access. Universal Health Services runs the same play directly: its corporate PAC (C00185520) raised $159,261 in the 2024 cycle and $142,568 so far in 2026, while reporting only $90,000 in federal lobbying for 2024 and $120,000 for 2023. For a company with a $6.2 billion behavioral health division, that is a rounding error — because the decisions that matter to it are made in state capitols and state Medicaid offices, where disclosure is thinner and dues-funded state associations do the work.

The Accreditor and the Trade Association Are the Same Organization

The most striking conflict in the sector is structural, legal, and hiding in plain sight.

Under Family First, a facility cannot draw unlimited Title IV-E reimbursement as a QRTP unless it is nationally accredited by one of a short list of bodies named in the statute — the Joint Commission, CARF, the Council on Accreditation, the Teaching-Family Association, or EAGLE. Accreditation is the load-bearing wall: it is what converts a 14-day federal reimbursement cap into an uncapped one.

In 2021, the Council on Accreditation merged with the Alliance for Strong Families and Communities — the nation's largest trade association for youth and family service providers — to form Social Current (EIN 39-1709925). COA now operates as "COA Accreditation, a service of Social Current." Members of Social Current's "Network Champions" tier receive a discount on the accreditation fee.

The financials show what the merger did to the organization's revenue base:

Tax year Total revenue Program service revenue Officer compensation
FY2021 $10,631,550 $782,658 $278,459
FY2022 $12,641,147 $9,176,051 $814,551
FY2023 $14,696,029 $10,791,101 $932,370

Program service revenue — accreditation fees and member dues — went from under $800,000 to $10.8 million in two years, and now constitutes 73% of the organization's income. Total assets: $24.6 million. The body that decides whether a residential provider qualifies for uncapped federal foster care reimbursement is financially sustained by the providers it accredits, inside the trade association that advocates for them.

The Senate Finance Committee, without naming Social Current, reached the obvious conclusion. Its recommendation to CMS and ACF: issue guidance "prioritizing or requiring independent state licensure in place of reliance on third-party accreditation."

The Revolving Door, in Three Directions

The personnel flow is not limited to regulators joining payrolls. It runs three ways.

Legislature to association. Kurt Kelly served in the Florida House of Representatives from June 2007 to November 2010. Since 2013 he has been President and CEO of the Florida Coalition for Children, the dues-funded trade association for the state's lead agencies. The IRS Business Master File lists the Coalition's care-of name as "% KURT KELLY." A former member of the body that appropriates the money now runs the organization funded by the recipients of it.

Company to company. In 2017 Jay Ripley sold a majority stake in Sequel Youth and Family Services to a private equity firm. In 2021, after sustained reporting on abuse and deaths — including the restraint death of 16-year-old Cornelius Fredericks at Lakeside Academy in Kalamazoo, Michigan, ruled a homicide, which led to involuntary manslaughter and second-degree child abuse charges against three staff and a state ban on prone restraints — Sequel sold 13 facilities to a newly incorporated company, Vivant Behavioral Healthcare, also founded by Ripley, which retained much of Sequel's leadership and footprint. The Senate Finance Committee's finding was blunt: "Exploiting corporate structures can enable RTF operators to evade oversight."

Agency to critique, and out. Florida DCF Secretary Chad Poppell resigned in February 2021 and said the quiet part aloud on the way out: privatization put decision-making in the hands of nonprofits while "DCF faded into the background and became too distant from the front lines of child welfare," producing "a fractured system that is not appropriately resourced… and is not performance-driven." He added: "This is not how I would design a system around my own children, and especially not our children in foster care."

What Happens When Nobody Audits

The failures are not hypothetical and they are not rare.

  • Universal Health Services paid $122 million in July 2020 to resolve False Claims Act allegations of billing Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE and the VA for medically unnecessary inpatient behavioral health services and failing to provide adequate care to adults and children — $117 million federal, $5 million from Turning Point — plus a separate ~$30 million omnibus settlement covering 18 cases, and a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with HHS-OIG.
  • Acadia Healthcare paid $19.85 million in a settlement announced September 2024 — $16.66 million federal, $3.19 million to Florida, Georgia, Michigan and Nevada — for admitting ineligible patients, extending stays improperly, and failing to provide adequate staffing, "which resulted in assaults, elopements, suicides and other harm."
  • The Mentor Network (now Sevita): a 2017 bipartisan Senate Finance investigation found 86 children died in its care over ten years, that the company conducted internal investigations in only 13 of those cases, and that roughly 70% of the deaths were unexpected.
  • Saint Francis Ministries won Omaha's foster care contract in 2019 by bidding roughly 40% below the incumbent — about $144.6 million less — then missed caseload ratios, visit requirements and documentation deadlines, took emergency state money, and was terminated in December 2021, with Nebraska DHHS resuming case management on January 3, 2022. Nebraska's Inspector General had recommended cancellation that September. Internal mismanagement included $80,000 on Chicago Cubs tickets; the former CEO and IT director were later indicted. Kansas subsequently declined to renew its Sedgwick County contract.
  • Eckerd Connects lost Florida's Hillsborough contract after roughly 60 to 70 children were on "night-to-night" status and about six per night slept on cots and under desks at the agency's Largo administrative office without clean clothes, toiletries, hot meals or shower facilities. The Pinellas County Sheriff opened a criminal investigation. DCF cited "repeated failures."
  • Florida's own auditors found nine DCF-contracted nonprofits appearing to pay executives above state-law limits — an inquiry triggered after the Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence, a DCF contractor, paid CEO Tiffany Carr more than $7.5 million over three years.

The Accountability Gap: A Statute Without an Enforcer

Four oversight mechanisms exist. None of them does this job.

The Byrd Amendment (31 U.S.C. § 1352), implemented by HHS at 45 C.F.R. Part 93, bars using appropriated funds to influence federal officials in connection with federal contracts, grants and cooperative agreements, requires a certification from every recipient of an award over $100,000, and requires an SF-LLL disclosure when non-federal money is used for such lobbying. Penalties run $10,000 to $100,000 per failure. Two problems: first, the statute reaches federal contracting and appropriations decisions — it does not, on its face, reach a state association lobbying a state legislature over per-diem rates, which is where the real money is decided. Second, and more damning, GAO's review (T-GGD-91-70) found that "required certifications and disclosure forms were not always made," that filed forms routinely omitted payments to lobbyists, names of persons lobbied and dates of service, and that "neither the amendment nor OMB's implementing guidance requires agencies to ensure that disclosure forms are completed." No public record identifies a single instance of ACF disallowing child welfare funds or assessing a § 1352 penalty against a child welfare grantee. The Presidential Memorandum of August 28, 2025, "Use of Appropriated Funds for Illegal Lobbying and Partisan Political Activity by Federal Grantees" — published in the Federal Register on September 3, 2025, and directing the Attorney General to investigate Byrd Amendment violations by grantees — is itself an admission that the statute has gone unenforced for three decades.

IRS Form 990 Schedule C requires 501(c)(3) and 501(c)(6) organizations to report lobbying and political expenditures. It is a self-reported tax schedule. No state child welfare agency reconciles a contractor's dues payments against the recipient association's Schedule C.

The Child and Family Services Review, ACF's flagship state oversight tool, has produced no state found in substantial conformity with all outcomes and systemic factors in twenty-five years. Its penalty is withheld IV-B and IV-E funds — money that flows to the same contractors.

State cost principles contain the rule (§ 200.450) and the exception (§ 200.454) in the same manual, and audit against neither.

Why It Matters, and What Would Actually Close It

A child in a QRTP at $500 a day generates $182,500 a year. Some fraction of that is dues. Those dues fund advocacy for higher rates, looser licensing, and — as NABH's stated legislative priority makes explicit — repeal of the Medicaid IMD exclusion, which would open a far larger federal spigot for institutional beds. The child has no lobbyist. The bed does.

Four fixes are available and none requires new legislation beyond a line of statutory text:

  1. Close § 200.454. Amend the cost principle so that dues are allowable only to the extent of the non-lobbying portion certified annually by the recipient organization — the same proration already required of 501(c)(6) organizations under IRC § 6033(e). Any association whose Schedule C reports lobbying expenditures should return that share of federally derived dues.
  2. Require an SF-LLL from subrecipients. Extend the Byrd disclosure requirement down the chain to state contractors drawing more than $100,000 in IV-E, IV-B, CCDF or Medicaid, covering state legislative and rate-setting advocacy, and publish the filings.
  3. Sever accreditation from advocacy. Congress should amend 42 U.S.C. § 672(k)(4)(G) to bar any entity that is, or is affiliated with, a trade association representing regulated providers from serving as a QRTP accreditor — the Senate Finance Committee's own recommendation, made concrete.
  4. Post-employment cooling-off. A two-year bar on state child welfare directors, deputy directors, licensing chiefs and rate-setting staff joining the payroll or board of a provider or provider association holding a contract with their former agency.

The Senate spent two years, 25,000 pages of documents and on-site visits to produce the definitive federal account of what happens to children in these facilities. It never once asked who paid for the rules. That question is still open, and the answer is on file at the IRS, the FEC and the Secretary of the Senate — in public, unexamined, and fully deductible.


Sources