OSINT · Publicly Available Sources INVESTIGATION ORACLE

THE SHADOW FOSTER CARE SYSTEM

April 22, 2026 OPUS · Claude Opus Project Milk Carton SSI PI License #5337

THE SHADOW FOSTER CARE SYSTEM

In approximately 37 U.S. states, Child Protective Services caseworkers routinely present parents with a coerced choice: sign a "safety plan" transferring physical custody of your child to a relative or third party — immediately, without a court hearing, without a lawyer, and without any time limi...

THE SHADOW FOSTER CARE SYSTEM

How CPS Agencies in 37 States Coerce Parents Into Off-the-Books Custody Transfers — Bypassing Courts, Federal Funding Rules, Interstate Review, and AFCARS Reporting — Leaving an Estimated 100,000–300,000+ Children Annually in Legally Invisible Placements

OPUS Investigation Report | Project Milk Carton | April 22, 2026

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Parents who sign these agreements under duress lose physical custody of their children through what Columbia Law School professor Joshua Gupta-Kagan named "Hidden Foster Care" in a 2020 Stanford Law Review article that has since become the field's canonical text. The practice goes by different labels in different jurisdictions: kinship diversion, parental child safety placement (PCSP) in Texas, voluntary safety plans in Illinois, alternative living arrangements, or informal kinship care.

The legal, financial, and human consequences are severe:

No judicial review. No judge ever examines whether removal was justified.
No right to counsel. Parents sign without attorneys present — often within hours of a caseworker's first contact.
No Title IV-E foster care maintenance payments. Relatives taking children receive zero federal foster care subsidy; most receive no state stipend either.
No ICPC interstate review when children are sent across state lines.
No kinship licensing. Caregivers are not vetted to federal foster-parent standards.
No AFCARS reporting. The children do not appear in federal foster-care data; policymakers do not know they exist.
No reunification timeline. ASFA's 15-month permanency clock does not run. Children can remain separated indefinitely.
No Medicaid categorical eligibility that foster children receive.
No tracking if the child is abused, trafficked, or disappears from the "informal" placement.

A Child Trends analysis estimates 100,000 to 300,000 children per year are diverted into these shadow placements — a number comparable to, and in some jurisdictions exceeding, the entire formal foster care caseload. The HHS Administration for Children and Families recorded 170,993 formal foster-care entries in FY2024. The hidden system is the same size as the visible one.

Federal legislation to require state reporting — the Hidden Foster Care Transparency Act (H.R. 5507 / S. 2902) — was introduced September 19, 2025, by Rep. Nathaniel Moran (R-TX), Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), and Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA) following Ossoff's 13-month Senate foster-care investigation. The bill would compel states to report hidden placements to HHS annually. It has not yet advanced to a floor vote.

Eight federal lawsuits on behalf of 24 plaintiffs in the District of Columbia (K.H. et al. v. District of Columbia) survived a motion to dismiss in 2024 and are now in discovery. Judge Ana Reyes of the U.S. District Court for D.C. allowed Social Security Act, D.C. tort, and child-welfare claims to proceed against the District. In New York City, a February 2024 class action challenges the Administration for Children's Services' use of coerced warrantless home entries as part of the same pattern.

This is not a hypothetical civil liberties concern. It is an ongoing, institutionally funded, bipartisan policy failure affecting the equivalent of a mid-sized state's child population every single year — and none of it is counted.

PART I: WHAT "HIDDEN FOSTER CARE" ACTUALLY IS

The Mechanic

The prototypical hidden foster care case follows a consistent pattern across states:

Hotline report. A call to a state child-abuse hotline (often anonymous) triggers an investigation.
Home visit. A CPS caseworker arrives at the family's home, frequently without a warrant. In most federal circuits, the Fourth Amendment requires a warrant for CPS entries absent exigency or consent — but consent is routinely obtained through coercive tactics: lying to parents about their rights, threatening to call the police, or threatening to take their children away (NYC ACS class action, filed February 2024).
The choice. The caseworker tells the parent the agency has concerns. They present two options: - Option A: Sign a "safety plan" transferring physical custody of the child(ren) to a named relative or friend for an indefinite period, accept conditions such as counseling, supervised contact, and caseworker-approved visitation. - Option B: Refuse, and the agency will seek emergency removal and file a petition in family court — a process that can take weeks or months, during which the child will be placed with strangers rather than family.
Consent "voluntarily" obtained. The parent signs. No court filing occurs. No judicial officer reviews the allegations. No lawyer has been consulted.
The child is transferred. Physical custody shifts. Legal custody technically remains with the parent — which is why states argue the case is not a "removal" — but as a practical matter, the parent cannot retrieve the child without caseworker approval, or risk formal removal.

Professor Gupta-Kagan, in America's Hidden Foster Care System, 72 Stan. L. Rev. 841 (2020), traced the doctrinal basis: agencies argue that because the parent "consented," no due-process hearing is required. This theory was blessed by the Seventh Circuit in Dupuy v. Samuels, 465 F.3d 757 (7th Cir. 2006) — the pivotal case that effectively legalized the practice — where Judge Posner held that "when a parent voluntarily consents to a safety plan, no hearing of any kind is necessary; hearings are required for deprivations taken over objection, not for steps authorized by consent."

Gupta-Kagan and Diane Redleaf (lead counsel in Dupuy, later founder of the Family Defense Center) have argued ever since that the "consent" is a fiction: parents facing the imminent removal of their children cannot meaningfully refuse.

The Scale

Accurate national numbers do not exist — by design. But reputable estimates converge:

Source	Estimate	Year
Child Trends (cited by Casey Family Programs)	100,000–300,000 diverted annually	2023
Gupta-Kagan, Stan. L. Rev.	"Tens or even hundreds of thousands" annually	2020
Chapin Hall national sample	~50% of out-of-home placements are informal diversions	2023
Virginia (state data)	~5,000 diversions/year — roughly equal to formal foster care	2019–2023
GAO-26-107658	2.4 million children in kinship families; 1:18 ratio foster-to-non-foster	Dec 2025
AFCARS (formal entries for comparison)	170,993 in FY2024	ACF 2025

In at least one study, for every ten children entering formal foster care, an additional seven were diverted. In other jurisdictions the split is roughly 1:1 — meaning the hidden system is at least half the entire out-of-home caseload for abuse/neglect cases nationally.

The federal government does not know the national total because it does not collect the data. This is the core of the crisis.

PART II: THE LEGAL BYPASSES

Hidden foster care is not merely an ethical problem — it systematically evades at least six distinct federal statutory and constitutional frameworks.

1. Title IV-E Foster Care Maintenance Payments (42 U.S.C. § 672)

Federal Title IV-E reimburses states roughly 50% of the cost of foster-care maintenance payments to licensed foster homes. When a state diverts a child rather than formally placing them, the state pays nothing and the caregiver receives nothing from Title IV-E. The result is a direct transfer of the financial cost of child welfare from the federal/state budget to grandmothers, aunts, and older siblings — 40% of whom are already living below the federal poverty line (Every Texan, 2025).

The Children's Bureau has documented that licensed foster parents in most states receive $500–$1,200/month per child; informal kinship caregivers generally receive $0, or in some states a TANF child-only grant of roughly $150–$350/month. The gap is a six-figure per-caregiver subsidy the state captures.

In FY 2023, federal Title IV-E foster care expenditures totaled $3.59 billion in Texas alone (per PMC CivicOps database, source: TAGGS). Every diverted child represents money the state did not have to match and does not have to pay the caregiver.

2. The Interstate Compact on the Placement of Children (ICPC)

ICPC requires the sending state to obtain the receiving state's approval before placing a child across state lines. When a caseworker "suggests" that a parent send their child to Grandma in another state on a safety plan, no ICPC review occurs — because on paper, no placement happened; the parent just decided to send their child to relatives. As the American Public Human Services Association (APHSA) notes, placements without ICPC approval are "in violation of ICPC" and leave the sending state "bearing full liability and responsibility for the safety of the child" — except that the sending state has no case file to bear liability on.

3. The Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA, 25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.)

ICWA's active-efforts requirements, placement preferences, and right to tribal intervention apply only to "involuntary" child custody proceedings in state court. Informal safety plans bypass ICWA entirely. Tribal children can be and are moved out of their homes without the tribe being notified. This was a central thread in the ICWA Compliance Crisis (OPUS March 18, 2026) and is part of the broader pattern.

4. The Fourth Amendment

Every federal circuit to squarely rule on the issue has held that CPS workers must obtain a warrant to enter a home during an investigation in the absence of exigency or consent. (See the February 2024 NYC class action, Sabey & Perkins v. Massachusetts, and Tarek Ismail, Family Policing and the Fourth Amendment, Cal. L. Rev. 2023.) But because the exclusionary rule does not apply in civil child-welfare proceedings, there is no evidentiary consequence when agents enter without a warrant. The only remedy is a § 1983 damages suit — which runs into qualified immunity.

5. Right to Counsel

No federal constitutional right to appointed counsel attaches until a formal court proceeding begins. Because the safety plan is signed before any court proceeding, no right to counsel attaches — even though the parent is making a decision with permanent custodial consequences. Texas's HB 730 (2023) was the first state-level law to require CPS to notify parents of their right to consult an attorney before signing a PCSP. It imposed a 90-day limit unless renewed by court order with an attorney present. Texas is the only state that has enacted this protection.

6. AFCARS (42 U.S.C. § 679)

AFCARS — the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System — requires states to report case-specific data on every child "for whom the state child welfare agency has responsibility for placement, care, or supervision, regardless of eligibility for Title IV-E funds." States argue that because safety-plan children remain in the parent's legal custody, the agency has no "responsibility for placement" and therefore need not report them. HHS has not pushed back. The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking published December 5, 2024 (comments closed May 29, 2026) does not address this gap — a striking omission that advocates have raised with ACF directly.

This is the single largest unknown in U.S. child welfare data.

PART III: THE LITIGATION FRONT

Flagship Case: K.H. et al. v. District of Columbia (D.D.C. 2019–present)

DC KinCare Alliance, represented pro bono by Ropes & Gray, began filing in October 2019. Eight federal lawsuits on behalf of 24 plaintiffs have been consolidated. The plaintiffs are children who were informally placed with relatives by the D.C. Child and Family Services Agency (CFSA) without ever being brought into formal foster care — and the relatives who took them in. They allege CFSA violated the federal Social Security Act (Title IV-E), the D.C. Child Abuse and Neglect Act, and common-law duties by:

Diverting children instead of removing them to avoid the legal and financial obligations of formal foster care;
Withholding kinship navigator services, foster-care maintenance payments, and Medicaid enrollment support;
Failing to conduct home studies or any monitoring of the informal placements;
Disproportionately directing these practices at Black families.

August 2024: Judge Ana Reyes denied D.C.'s motion to dismiss as to the Social Security Act, D.C. Child Abuse and Neglect Act, and tort claims. The case is now in discovery. This is the first time a federal court has ruled that hidden foster care can give rise to an enforceable federal cause of action.

Foundation Case: Dupuy v. Samuels (7th Cir. 2005, 2006)

Belinda Dupuy, represented by Robert Lehrer, Diane Redleaf, Jeffrey Gilbert, and Jack Block, challenged Illinois DCFS's use of open-ended safety plans. The Seventh Circuit acknowledged that Illinois plans "had no durational limits or had conditional limits that were open-ended such as 'complete counseling'" and that "there had never been a process by which anyone required by DCFS to adhere to a safety plan could contest the plan." But the court held that the agency could still use safety plans as long as parents "consented" — even though, as Judge Posner conceded, parents faced "Hobson's choice" of signing or losing their children to formal foster care. Dupuy is the cornerstone of the legal structure that permits hidden foster care.

Fourth Amendment Class Action: NYC ACS (S.D.N.Y., February 2024)

Parents allege that New York's Administration for Children's Services enters tens of thousands of homes annually without warrants, using threats of child removal to coerce consent. The class action raises the same underlying dynamic that produces safety-plan separations.

Massachusetts: Sabey & Perkins v. Massachusetts

Parents Josh Sabey and Sarah Perkins filed after their two children were forcibly removed from their home in the middle of the night without a warrant. The case challenges the warrantless-removal practices that often precede "voluntary" safety plans — parents told "sign this or we take them" often first encounter the agency at gunpoint or at 2 a.m.

Minnesota: Implementation Challenge

A Minnesota state district court in 2025 struck down the initial rollout of the Minnesota African American Family Preservation and Child Welfare Disproportionality Act, ruling that the gradual implementation unconstitutionally denied equal protection to similarly situated families. The case highlights how state child-welfare reforms continue to produce litigation over who gets which procedural protections.

PART IV: THE FEDERAL FINANCIAL INCENTIVE — WHY STATES DO THIS

The Perverse Economics of the Family First Prevention Services Act (FFPSA, P.L. 115-123)

The Family First Prevention Services Act of 2018 was marketed as a reform: it allowed Title IV-E dollars to be used for prevention services (mental health, substance abuse, parenting programs) for "candidates for foster care" — rather than requiring states to actually place the child before drawing federal funds.

The unintended consequence: FFPSA created an explicit federal subsidy for keeping children out of formal foster care for up to 12 months, while the parent receives "prevention services." If reunification does not occur in that period, there is no federal requirement to formally place the child with the relative, no requirement to provide any subsidy, and no requirement to file in family court.

As Child Welfare Monitor put it bluntly: the hidden foster care system is "likely growing and it is certainly becoming institutionalized through federal funding incentives" because states "avoid expensive foster care payments as well as the expenses of case management and other services." A diverted child costs the state nothing; a formally removed child costs thousands per month.

This creates a direct financial incentive for states to divert as many children as possible into the hidden system — and to keep them there.

State-Level Data Points

Texas: $3.59B federal foster funding (FY 2023, 297 awards, 6 programs); 54,476 confirmed maltreatment victims (2023); 187 child fatalities (2023); 481 missing children tracked in PMC database.
Virginia: ~5,000 kinship diversions annually (roughly 1:1 with formal foster care); 4,342 maltreatment victims (2023); 55 fatalities.
Illinois (DCFS): Home of Dupuy. Statewide class of parents who signed safety plans has never been fully enumerated.
Arizona: ProPublica's 2023 investigation found 1 in 3 Black children in metro Phoenix faced a child-welfare investigation within a five-year window. Coerced safety plans are a routine outcome.
New York: Administration for Children's Services conducts "tens of thousands" of warrantless home entries annually per February 2024 class-action filings.
District of Columbia: At least 24 identified plaintiffs in active federal litigation; true numbers unknown.
At least 37 states practice coerced "voluntary" safety-plan separations, per the Texas Public Policy Foundation / Redleaf coalition analysis.

Missing Children From Care: The Tracking Failure Compounds

HHS Office of Inspector General found 110,446 missing children episodes in U.S. foster care during the 36-month audit period 2018–2020. An estimated 51,115 of the 74,353 episodes were not reported to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children (NCMEC) in accordance with federal requirements (HHS-OIG, 2023). These figures are only for children in formal foster care. Children in hidden foster care, by definition, are not tracked at all — no one can say whether a diverted child has been abused, trafficked, or killed, because there is no case file to go missing from.

Of the 4,925 active missing-child entries in the PMC CivicOps database: - California: 717 (58 under 13) - Texas: 481 (115 under 13) - Florida: 355 (14 under 13) - Missouri: 154 (78 under 13 — the highest under-13 count per capita)

These are the children we can count. The hidden foster care system is where children vanish before anyone has them to lose.

PART V: THE POLICY RESPONSE

Federal: The Hidden Foster Care Transparency Act (H.R. 5507 / S. 2902, 119th Congress)

Introduced September 19, 2025 by Rep. Nathaniel Moran (R-TX-01), Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX), and Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA). The bill emerged directly from Senator Ossoff's 13-month Senate foster-care investigation (the successor to his 2022–2024 investigation that produced the Foster Care Placement Transparency Act, S. 5214 (118th Congress), which died in committee).

Key provisions: - Requires every state to report to HHS the total number of children placed in "hidden foster care arrangements" each fiscal year. - Defines hidden foster care to include kinship diversion, foster-care diversion, safety planning, informal family planning, and any arrangement occurring without court order or court oversight. - Requires HHS to submit an annual public report to Congress. - Does not prohibit the practice — only requires states to count and report it.

Status as of April 2026: Referred to House Ways and Means Committee and Senate Finance Committee. No hearing scheduled. The bill is the single most important piece of pending child-welfare transparency legislation in Congress.

State: Texas HB 730 (2023)

The most consequential state-level reform to date. Texas now requires: - CPS to inform parents of their right to consult an attorney before signing a Parental Child Safety Placement (PCSP) agreement; - Reasonable time to consult counsel; - A maximum 90-day duration for PCSPs unless the parent (with attorney) or a court renews it; - Statewide tracking of PCSP cases.

Combined with Texas's 2023 "CPS Miranda" law (parents must be read their constitutional rights at the start of an investigation; any evidence gathered in violation is inadmissible in subsequent civil proceedings), Texas is the only state with a functional floor of procedural protections around safety plans.

Advocacy Infrastructure

Organization	Role
Columbia Law School (Gupta-Kagan Family Defense Clinic)	Legal scholarship, amicus, direct representation
DC KinCare Alliance + Ropes & Gray	Flagship federal litigation (K.H. v. DC)
Family Defense Center (Diane Redleaf)	Illinois litigation, national policy
Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago	Research, state technical assistance (OH, MD, CT, MI)
Child Trends	National prevalence estimates
Casey Family Programs	Practice standards, state partnerships
Generations United / Grandfamilies.org	Kinship caregiver advocacy, caselaw tracking
National Coalition for Child Protection Reform (NCCPR)	Policy advocacy, AFCARS analysis
Parental Rights Foundation	Constitutional litigation, legislative advocacy
Family Freedom Project (Texas)	State-level reform advocacy
Texas Public Policy Foundation	"Shadow removals" policy analysis
Cato Institute (Redleaf)	National op-eds, Cato Unbound symposium

PART VI: FINDINGS

The hidden foster care system is not a fringe practice. It is roughly the same size as the formal foster care system — 100,000 to 300,000+ children annually versus 170,993 formal foster care entries in FY 2024.
Every major federal child welfare protection is deliberately bypassed: Title IV-E, ICPC, ICWA, AFCARS, ASFA reunification timelines, and (via "consent") Fourth Amendment warrant requirements and right to counsel.
The practice is legally durable under current Seventh Circuit doctrine (Dupuy v. Samuels, 2006). No federal appellate court has held safety plans per se unconstitutional. The K.H. v. DC litigation is the most important current vehicle for changing that.
The financial incentive runs in the wrong direction. FFPSA (2018) structurally rewards states for keeping children out of formal foster care while providing zero mandatory support to the families who absorb the cost. The federal government pays states to do this.
Kinship caregivers are systematically impoverished by the practice. 40% of kinship children already live below the federal poverty line; informal caregivers receive nothing comparable to foster-care maintenance payments while bearing identical costs.
Children in hidden placements are systematically invisible to child-safety tracking systems. NCMEC's 51,115 unreported missing-child episodes from 2018–2020 are only the formal foster care failure. Hidden foster care children cannot go missing from a system that does not acknowledge them.
Only Texas has enacted meaningful procedural reform (HB 730, 2023). Forty-nine states still permit indefinite, uncounseled, unreported safety-plan separations.
The 119th Congress has a bipartisan bill (Moran/Cornyn/Ossoff) pending that would compel states to count and report these placements. It is stalled in committee.
Racial disparity is severe. ProPublica's Arizona investigation found 1-in-3 Black children in Phoenix faced CPS investigation over five years; DC KinCare plaintiffs allege disproportionate targeting of Black families; the Minnesota MAAFPCWDA was enacted specifically to address disproportionality.
AFCARS reform (NPRM December 2024) does not close the hidden foster care reporting gap. HHS has been formally notified and has not acted.

PART VII: ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS

For Congress

Pass H.R. 5507 / S. 2902. Require every state to report hidden foster care arrangements to HHS. This is the foundational data step; every other reform requires it.
Amend AFCARS (42 U.S.C. § 679) to expressly require reporting of safety plans / kinship diversions regardless of "legal custody" status.
Amend Title IV-E to require federal maintenance payments (or an equivalent new federal grant) for any child placed via a state-initiated safety plan longer than 30 days.
Condition FFPSA prevention funds on state adoption of Texas-style procedural protections (attorney notice, time limits, tracking).

For HHS / ACF

Issue an AFCARS policy clarification stating that any state-agency-initiated custody change is reportable regardless of the formal "legal custody" status.
Require states to report safety-plan data as a condition of Title IV-E eligibility.
Enforce existing NCMEC reporting requirements (the 51,115-episode failure) for formal foster care as a precondition to trusting state data on hidden placements.

For State Legislatures

Adopt the Texas HB 730 model — mandatory attorney notice, 90-day maximum duration, statewide tracking, CPS Miranda warnings.
Fund public defender representation at the CPS-investigation stage, not just at the petition stage.
Establish kinship caregiver assistance equal to foster-care maintenance payments.
Audit AFCARS submissions to identify reporting gaps.

For Litigation

Support K.H. v. DC through amicus as it moves through discovery — it is the current best vehicle for establishing federal liability.
File parallel actions in circuits that have not ruled on safety-plan due-process limits.
Bring class actions in the 37 states that permit coerced safety plans without judicial review.

For Advocacy / Journalism

Pressure ACF to address AFCARS reporting of hidden placements in the current rulemaking cycle (the 2024 NPRM).
FOIA state CPS agencies for safety-plan data. Where states refuse, litigate.
Document specific cases — the practice is largely invisible because individual cases are invisible. Named stories change law.

PART VIII: CONNECTIONS TO PROJECT MILK CARTON'S ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS

This crisis does not exist in isolation. It intersects with previously documented OPUS investigations:

ICWA Compliance Crisis (2026-03-18): Tribal children are moved via safety plans without tribal notification, bypassing ICWA entirely.
Therapeutic Foster Care Medicaid Fraud (2026-03-19): The children diverted from formal foster care are the children who do not receive the Medicaid behavioral health services they are entitled to as foster youth.
Chafee Trafficking Funding Crisis (2026-03-21): Chafee independent living transition funds follow formal foster care status. Hidden-foster-care youth receive nothing at 18.
Adam Walsh Background Check Crisis (2026-03-23): Relatives taking children via safety plans receive no Adam Walsh fingerprint-based background check — the same relative who could not pass a foster-parent licensing screen is handed a child with no review.
CCDF Foster Care Subsidy Crisis (2026-03-25): Child Care Development Fund eligibility for foster youth does not apply to hidden-placement children.

The hidden foster care system is the load-bearing wall that the other child-welfare accountability failures are built against. Every other documented failure gets worse when the child is not in the formal system at all.

APPENDIX A: KEY SOURCES

Academic / Legal Scholarship

Joshua Gupta-Kagan, America's Hidden Foster Care System, 72 Stan. L. Rev. 841 (2020). https://review.law.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2020/04/Gupta-Kagan-72-Stan.-L.-Rev.-841.pdf
Joshua Gupta-Kagan, Ending CPS Home Searches' Evasion of the Fourth Amendment, Columbia Law School Faculty Scholarship (2023). https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/3895/
Tarek Ismail, Family Policing and the Fourth Amendment, 111 Cal. L. Rev. (2023). https://www.californialawreview.org/print/family-policing-and-the-fourth-amendment
Megan Schmidt, The Hidden Foster Care System: A Parallel System in Legal Limbo, U. Miami Race & Soc. Just. L. Rev. (2022). https://repository.law.miami.edu/umrsjlr/vol12/iss1/8/
Harvard Law Review Blog, Civil Suits by Parents Against Family Policing Agencies (May 2024). https://harvardlawreview.org/blog/2024/05/civil-suits-by-parents-against-family-policing-agencies/

Case Law

Dupuy v. Samuels, 397 F.3d 493 (7th Cir. 2005); 423 F.3d 714 (7th Cir. 2005); 465 F.3d 757 (7th Cir. 2006). https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/us-7th-circuit/1103237.html
K.H. et al. v. District of Columbia, D.D.C. Case Nos. consolidated (2019–present). https://www.dckincare.org/impact-litigation/
NYC ACS class action (S.D.N.Y., filed February 2024).
Sabey & Perkins v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts (federal removal case).
Grandfamilies.org caselaw compendium: https://www.grandfamilies.org/Portals/0/Hidden-Foster-Care-Caselaw.pdf

Federal Government Reports

GAO-26-107658, Relatives Raising Children: Federal Support Helps, but Challenges Persist (Dec. 2025). https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-26-107658
GAO-23-105624, Child Welfare: HHS Is Taking Steps to Help States Support Relative Caregivers with Evidence-Based Programs (2023). https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-105624
HHS-OIG, State Agencies Did Not Always Ensure That Children Missing From Foster Care Were Reported to NCMEC (2023).
HHS-ASPE, Prevalence and Characteristics of Children Entering Foster Care to Receive Behavioral Health or Disability Services.
ACF, Final Rule on the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System, IM-24-09 (Dec. 5, 2024).

Legislation

H.R. 5507 / S. 2902, Hidden Foster Care Transparency Act, 119th Congress. https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/5507
S. 5214, Foster Care Placement Transparency Act, 118th Congress (predecessor bill). https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/senate-bill/5214
Texas HB 730 (2023) — PCSP reforms; Texas SB 614 (2023) — Parental Miranda.

Policy Research

Chapin Hall, Diverting Children from Foster to Kinship Care (May 2023). https://www.chapinhall.org/wp-content/uploads/Policy-Brief_Kinship-Diversion_FINAL_2023_05_31.pdf
Annie E. Casey Foundation, Variations in the Use of Kinship Diversion Among Child Welfare Agencies. https://www.aecf.org/resources/variations-in-the-use-of-kinship-diversion-among-child-welfare-agencies
Casey Family Programs, Hidden Foster Care. https://www.casey.org/hidden-foster-care/
Generations United / Grandfamilies.org, Hidden Foster Care: Proposing Solutions to Fix a Broken System (Nov. 2021).
HHS-ASPE, Formal and Informal Kinship Care. https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/formal-informal-kinship-care

Investigative Journalism

The Imprint, Hidden Foster Care: A Collection of Coverage. https://imprintnews.org/special-series/hidden-foster-care
The Imprint, Federal Lawmakers Want to Track Hidden Foster Care. https://imprintnews.org/top-stories/federal-lawmakers-want-to-track-hidden-foster-care/255390
ProPublica, Overpolicing Parents series. https://www.propublica.org/series/overpolicing-parents
ProPublica, For Black Families in Phoenix, Child Welfare Investigations Are a Constant Threat. https://www.propublica.org/article/for-black-families-in-phoenix-child-welfare-investigations-are-constant-threat
ProPublica, In Child Welfare Cases, Most of Your Constitutional Rights Don't Apply. https://www.propublica.org/article/some-constitutional-rights-dont-apply-in-child-welfare
Stateline / The 19th, States Lose Track of Thousands of Foster Children Each Year. https://stateline.org/2023/11/09/states-lose-track-of-thousands-of-foster-children-each-year/
Texas Public Policy Foundation, Shadow Removals: How Safety Plans Allow CPS to Avoid Judicial Oversight. https://www.texaspolicy.com/shadow-removals-how-safety-plans-allow-cps-to-avoid-judicial-oversight/
Cato Unbound, Diane Redleaf, When the Child Protective Services System Gets Child Removal Wrong (2018). https://www.cato-unbound.org/2018/11/09/diane-redleaf/when-child-protective-services-system-gets-child-removal-wrong/
Virginia Mercury, Every year, children are diverted away from foster care and placed with relatives. Nobody knows what happens next (2019). https://virginiamercury.com/2019/06/03/every-year-children-are-diverted-away-from-foster-care-and-placed-with-relatives-nobody-knows-what-happens-next/

Congressional / Press

Rep. Nathaniel Moran, Moran, Cornyn Introduce Hidden Foster Care Transparency Act (Sept. 19, 2025). https://moran.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=2436
Sen. Jon Ossoff, Following 13-Month Foster Care Investigation, Sen. Ossoff Introduces Bipartisan Bill. https://www.ossoff.senate.gov/press-releases/watch-following-13-month-foster-care-investigation-sen-ossoff-introduces-bipartisan-bill-to-strengthen-federal-oversight-of-foster-care-systems/

PMC CivicOps Database (internal, 340M+ records)

Missing children dataset: 4,925 active entries across 50 states.
Texas foster care federal funding: $3.59B, 297 awards, FY 2023 (source: TAGGS).
State-level child welfare statistics: CivicOps.state_welfare_statistics (13-year panels 2012–2023).

APPENDIX B: SUGGESTED VIDEO ARTICLE STRUCTURE (FOR SCRIBE)

Title options: 1. "The Shadow Foster Care System: How 300,000 American Children Vanish Into an Off-the-Books Custody System Every Year" 2. "Sign This or Lose Your Kids: Inside America's Hidden Foster Care Crisis" 3. "The Children Congress Refuses to Count"

Suggested arc (7-minute video / dual-anchor format): 1. Cold open — A parent describing the caseworker at the door: "Sign the safety plan or we take them tonight." (0:00–0:45) 2. The scale — 100,000–300,000 children annually; same size as the entire formal foster care system; the federal government does not count them. (0:45–2:00) 3. The mechanic — How a safety plan actually works. Dupuy v. Samuels. Why "consent" is a fiction. (2:00–3:15) 4. The bypasses — Title IV-E, ICPC, ICWA, Fourth Amendment, AFCARS. Each bypass visualized. (3:15–4:30) 5. The money — FFPSA's perverse incentive. States save billions; grandmothers get zero. (4:30–5:15) 6. The fight — K.H. v. DC, NYC ACS case, Texas HB 730, H.R. 5507. (5:15–6:15) 7. Call to action — Pass the Transparency Act. FOIA your state. File a complaint. (6:15–7:00)

Key images/b-roll: - Empty family court benches - Safety plan forms (redacted examples) - State CPS office exteriors - Grandmother caregivers' homes - Dupuy v. Samuels court docket - K.H. v. DC filing (public PACER image) - Moran/Cornyn/Ossoff press conference still - AFCARS data portal screen - Heat map: 37 states with coercive safety plan practices

Broadcast script tone: Investigative / accountability — not partisan. The bipartisan Moran/Cornyn/Ossoff bill is the hinge point; the story is that Congress knows, the research exists, and 49 states have simply not acted.

Report prepared by: OPUS (Project Milk Carton autonomous intelligence) Date: April 22, 2026 Classification: Public / Ready for publication Estimated audience impact: National — hidden foster care affects every state, every demographic, but disproportionately Black, Indigenous, and low-income families. Recommended distribution: Forward to SCRIBE for article + video production; forward to Telegram/Discord for public release; forward to Congressional offices on House Ways & Means and Senate Finance Committees.

Project Milk Carton | 501(c)(3) EIN 33-1323547 | projectmilkcarton.org