0

children are missing right now.

That number comes from NCMEC — the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children.
But here's what nobody tells you—

Nobody is watching
the watchers.

1
States report their own numbers to the federal government. Nobody independently verifies the count.

AFCARS — the federal system that tracks every child in foster care — relies entirely on state-submitted data. There is no federal field verification. A state could undercount by 30% and the system would never flag it.

Source: HHS Administration for Children & Families, AFCARS Technical Bulletin
2
Those numbers set their own funding. The state is reporting its own data to determine its own budget.

Title IV-E reimbursement is calculated directly from state-reported foster care numbers. Report fewer children → less scrutiny. Report more → more money. Both incentives are perverse. No external formula checks the inputs.

Source: Title IV-E, Social Security Act §472–479
3
That funding flows to nonprofits nobody audits. The IRS audits fewer than 1% of exempt organizations.

In our database alone: 630,263 Form 990 Schedule I grants totaling $89.1 billion — distributed with virtually no outcome verification. The IRS checks if paperwork was filed, not whether a single child was helped.

Source: IRS Data Book / PMC CivicOps Database (630K+ grant records)
4
Those nonprofits fund the legislators who write the oversight rules and appropriate the next round of money.

Board members and executives of child welfare nonprofits contribute to campaigns of legislators sitting on child welfare oversight committees — the same committees that approve their next round of funding. We cross-reference 213M+ FEC records to map these connections.

Source: FEC Individual Contributions Database (213M+ records)
5
Oversight uses the state's own data as the benchmark. The fox grades its own exam with answer keys it wrote.

The CFSR — the federal government's primary child welfare oversight tool — uses state-submitted data as its baseline. The auditor's source material comes from the entity being audited. The loop is closed. There is no external reference point in the entire chain.

Source: HHS Child & Family Services Review (CFSR) Process Guide

There is no external reference point in the entire chain.
Every measurement instrument is pointed inward.

The greatest secret a government keeps from its people
isn't classified.

It's public record
that nobody knows
how to read.

Until now.

Project Milk Carton

501(c)(3) Nonprofit • Est. 2024

In the 1980s, missing children's faces appeared on milk cartons at every breakfast table in America. It worked — until the AMBER Alert made it obsolete. We're bringing that awareness back, powered by technology and the belief that when citizens learn to see the system clearly, the system has no choice but to change.

0M+
Public Records
$0B
Grants Tracked
0
Analytical Tools
0
Jurisdictions

Three Pillars. One Mission.

PMC Foundation

Education & Outreach

We teach families and communities how child welfare systems actually work — not how they describe themselves. CPS navigation, legal literacy, and the tools to see through the gaps.

PMC Investigations

Research & Intelligence

Open-source intelligence, funding flow analysis, nonprofit financials, and political donation cross-referencing. We trace the money. We map the networks. We publish what we find.

17-SOG Media

Publishing & Journalism

Investigative journalism, state-by-state analysis, and educational content reaching 29,000+ readers. If we find it, we publish it. Facts, not fear. Data, not drama.

Five Queries. Five Minutes.

Watch what one person with our tools uncovers about a single state.

1
Foster care statistics → Oklahoma
"11,406 children in foster care."
A number. It tells you nothing.

Oklahoma's rate is 15.2 per 1,000 children — more than double the national average of 5.7. That's not just "a lot of foster kids." That's a system pulling children at an extraordinary rate, and nobody asking whether that rate itself is the problem.

Source: HHS AFCARS Report, FY2023
2
Federal grants → Oklahoma child welfare
"$189M in Title IV-E funding."
Now it has a price tag. $16,570 per child. But who gets that money?

Title IV-E reimburses states per child in care. More removals = more revenue. The federal match rate for Oklahoma is 68.4% — meaning for every dollar spent, the feds cover 68 cents. The financial incentive runs in the opposite direction of family preservation.

Source: Title IV-E Federal Match Rates, FMAP Tables
3
Nonprofit search → top child welfare orgs
"Top 5 control 68% of funding. Three share board members."
Not 47 organizations. A cluster.

When three organizations share board members and collectively control two-thirds of a state's child welfare funding, they don't compete — they coordinate. IRS Form 990 Schedule I shows where the money goes. Cross-referencing officer names reveals the network nobody draws on a whiteboard.

Source: IRS Form 990 / PMC CivicOps Database (630K+ grant records)
4
Political donations → those board members
"$127K donated to legislators on child welfare oversight committees."
The people getting the money fund the people giving the money.

This is the loop: nonprofits receive grants → executives donate to legislators → legislators sit on committees that approve the next round of grants. It's not illegal. It's not hidden. It's just never been cross-referenced before. We match 213M+ FEC records against nonprofit officer lists automatically.

Source: FEC Individual Contributions + IRS 990 Officer Data
5
Outcome comparison → Oklahoma vs. national
"Maltreatment recurrence 9.1% vs. national 6.3%. No improvement in 4 years."
More money. Worse outcomes. Nobody connecting the dots.

A child who enters Oklahoma's system has a 44% higher chance of being maltreated again than the national average. Funding increased 12% over the same period. The money went up. The outcomes didn't move. That's not a funding problem — it's an accountability problem.

Source: HHS CFSR Round 4, NCANDS Child File

Five queries. Five minutes. A story nobody else is telling.

This was one state. There are fifty.

Not Another Awareness Campaign

Every other platform teaches you the system as it describes itself.

What Others Teach
What PMC Teaches
"Here's how to read a 990."
"Here's what a 990 hides, who doesn't check it, and how to cross-reference it against 4 other databases."
"Here's how federal funding works."
"Here's how funding decisions loop back to the people making them — and where the loop breaks."
"Here's how to report child abuse."
"Here's what happens after you report, who tracks whether anything happened, and where cases disappear."
"Here's the data on foster care."
"Here's who produced that data, who benefits from it looking a certain way, and what it doesn't measure."
“When one dwells, one becomes ruled eventually —
even by the nicest intentions.”

— Andrew Fayal, Founder

Don't dwell. Become a steward.

Ready to See for Yourself?

Both tracks start with training. You'll learn the tools before you use them.

User Track

I Want to Use the Tools
  • Generate reports, infographics, and milk cartons
  • Share factual data with your community
  • Access 196 tools across 15 rooms
  • Search $148B in grants and 340M+ records
  • Produce content that drives awareness
Start as User

Volunteer Track

I Want to Join the Mission
  • Structured training: Foundation, Investigations, or Media
  • 16 specialized roles with mastery paths
  • Become an investigator, educator, or journalist
  • Contribute to active investigations
  • Hold the system accountable
Apply as Volunteer